<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sustainability &#8211; Linear versus Circular Economic Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jessestallone.com/2009/07/31/sustainability-linear-versus-circular-economic-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jessestallone.com/2009/07/31/sustainability-linear-versus-circular-economic-model/</link>
	<description>Sustainable Thoughts and Reflections from a life gone by...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:02:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matei</title>
		<link>http://jessestallone.com/2009/07/31/sustainability-linear-versus-circular-economic-model/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matei]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessestallone.com/?p=211#comment-264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great thiinnkg! That really breaks the mold!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thiinnkg! That really breaks the mold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Caine</title>
		<link>http://jessestallone.com/2009/07/31/sustainability-linear-versus-circular-economic-model/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T. Caine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 02:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessestallone.com/?p=211#comment-11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good post Jesse. You&#039;ve hit the nail on the head here. Only days ago I saw a blogger write that there were reasons to be mindful of the environment, but not &quot;for it&#039;s own sake.&quot; It struck me as amazingly foolish. 

I think most people have not yet come to the realization that in the end, there are no unanswered actions. There are no policies, products or processes that do not affects us in some way. There is no what is good for us vs. what is good for the environment. 

To make that change, sustainability cannot be thought of as a technological fix that supplements a wasteful way of life. Instead, sustainability is a lifestyle--an all encompassing mentality of balance, stasis and connectivity. There is probably no corner of our culture that could not see some rethinking for a new age of mindfulness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Jesse. You&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head here. Only days ago I saw a blogger write that there were reasons to be mindful of the environment, but not &#8220;for it&#8217;s own sake.&#8221; It struck me as amazingly foolish. </p>
<p>I think most people have not yet come to the realization that in the end, there are no unanswered actions. There are no policies, products or processes that do not affects us in some way. There is no what is good for us vs. what is good for the environment. </p>
<p>To make that change, sustainability cannot be thought of as a technological fix that supplements a wasteful way of life. Instead, sustainability is a lifestyle&#8211;an all encompassing mentality of balance, stasis and connectivity. There is probably no corner of our culture that could not see some rethinking for a new age of mindfulness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

